LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Iptables, Best choice in H.A.

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Iptables, Best choice in H.A.
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:12:55 -0500
Federico wrote:

> A load balancing Firewall-Iptables-Cluster, so If an interface of one node
> goes down, the second interface keeps routing to other nets.

I'm assuming you want an LVS'ed firewall with HA in orswe to handle
the situation where 1 NIC goes down on a host, but otherwise
the host (and the other NICs on it) are still functional.

The chances of this happening I would expect small. 
Current computer hardware is reliable now and the items
that fail the most are disks with moving parts. Even
these are reliable nowadays, all failing near the end
of their warantee period. I suggest changing out 3yr 
disks after 2yrs.

The main use of HA is not for hardware failure but
to allow planned maintenance without interruption to service.

You will get more network interruptions than hardware failures
until you reach a cluster with several 100nodes.

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>