LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Iptables, Best choice in H.A.

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Iptables, Best choice in H.A.
From: "Timothy Webster" <tdwebste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:31:17 -0500
When you get this working let me know. This is exactly what I need.

Many Thanks 

-Tim.



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Federico" <egopfe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:54:40 +0100

>I'm planning to make a Linux Firewall Cluster running iptables.
>I've some doubt, It's the first time for me to make a cluster.
>My firewall box is for first a router, wich control routing between
>different DMZs and LAN.
>
>So I must keep routing for first, then firewalling.
>
>I've found that an only heartbeat cluster, is not a REAL H.A. solution,
>beacause if a selected interface goes down (there are many reason) the
>heartbeat doesn't make the hypotetical second node to keep services. This
>beacuse is hard to realize if a route goes down, not only interface... If
>was only interface I've made a simple SNMP script that checks the interface,
>but I must keep routing.
>
>I've tough this way, and I wanna discuss them with yours.
>
>A load balancing Firewall-Iptables-Cluster, so If an interface of one node
>goes down, the second interface keeps routing to other nets.
>
>Now I wanna now your opinions and if Virtual Server can help me to build
>this kind of cluster.
>
>Thank you in Advance
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>