|
Am 04.01.2002 13:55:57 schrieb lvs-users-admin:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 andreas.hartmann@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm wondering that there is no kernel-patch for 2.2.20 available. Is it
> > because
> > the 2.2.19-patch is working on 2.2.20 too or are there other issues why
there
> > is no patch for 2.2.20?
> >
>
> Yes, the ipvs-1.0.8-2.2.19.patch can be applied to kernel 2.2.20. Since
> there is no very urgent issues on ipvs-1.0.8 for kernel 2.2, we don't
> hurry up releasing ipvs-1.0.9.
Thank you for your quick answer! IMHO You are right to do so.
I'm running here since half a year linuxvirtualserver / tunneling (2 directors,
2 realserver) within a security zone as ftp-server for about 22000 clients.
The availability since that time has been 100% :-). Better then all S390-based
applications in our bussines!
The peak the system has to manage are about 20000 connects / filetransfers in
15 minutes!
This shows up, that you did a great work! Thank you very much!
I've got an additional question:
Is it possible to manage / distribute in the mentioned system clients, which
come via masquerading from firewall? This means, they all would come with the
same source IP.
I think it shouldn't work because of the persistent option, which I need for
ftp. All connects would be sent to the same realserver. Or am I wrong?
Thank you for your advice,
Andreas Hartmann
|
