On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ian C. Sison wrote:
>
> >
> > Without TP the packets will just flow on past the default route of the
> > LVS gateway, into the net. the director only redirects to the squids if
> > you telnet to port 80 of the director. At least, that's what my
> > observations show...
>
> the packets should be marked by your fwmark rule and then sent through the
> LVS forwarding code (ie what you've done looks about right). Do you know
> that your packets are getting marked and forwarded by LVS? Try a simple
> test with marking packets to the telnet port.
Yes they are marked, because the byte/packet counter increases when i pass
traffic through but ... i get the SYN_RECV problem.. It's like after
marking, the LVS does get a hold of the request but can't seem to
establish a TCP connection to the RealServers correctly. It hangs at
SYN_RECV
==============================================================
IPVS connection entries
pro expire state source virtual destination
TCP 00:57.22 SYN_RECV 202.181.160.6:32770 202.181.160.11:80 192.168.254.1:80
|