![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Dual NIC'd Real Servers under LVS-DR |
| From: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:18:15 -0500 |
Keith Hellman wrote: > My goal is to keep the Director load as low as possible The director load is pretty low with VS-DR. I'd check it first in some simulation before you decide if you need it. The only time anyone has had any trouble with a VS-DR director is with Gbps ethernet running at high load. Joe -- Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Dual NIC'd Real Servers under LVS-DR, Keith Hellman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LVS as part of a traffic path?, Axel Kuester |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Dual NIC'd Real Servers under LVS-DR, Keith Hellman |
| Next by Thread: | Dual NIC'd Real Servers under LVS-DR- DAMN!, Keith Hellman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |