|
Yes we do sell a load balancer based off of the lvs project. We use lvs
to provide high availability for our flagship adserver product.
LVS has enabled us to provide a cost effective load balancing
solution to our customers without having to go to a costly 3rd
solution. We had purchased a webmux server from redhill networks
about 2 years ago to do our initial load balancing. It started to lock on
us quite frequently and we wanted to expand the feature set. When we
found out it was based off an open source project called lvs, I flocked to
the website and began educating myself. The webmux now collects dust in
our parts room. Because of the high volume of ads being served and the
risk of failure with a single server, lvs has fit nicely into our product
matrix. We've incorporated a lot of our own code to customize our
product, including extending mons capabilities for server health
monitoring as well as a web interface. The price of the load balancer
depends on the hardware specs of the box.
Hayden Myers
Support Manager
Skyline Network Technologies
hayden@xxxxxxxxxxx
(888)917-1600x120
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Wayne wrote:
> How much do you sell for your product based on LVS?
> It looks like you are selling a load balancer based on LVS.
>
> At 03:34 PM 3/14/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >Whoah where are all these stats coming from? It looks like it may be time
> >to move up to the 2.4 series. The connection table syncing looks
> >appealing as well. Anything else I'm missing in the latest 2.2 version?
> >We've had close to a perfect record with 2.2, I'd hate to leave it but
> >it's aging and I assume all new development is focused on the 2.4 version.
> >
> >Hayden Myers
> >Support Manager
> >Skyline Network Technologies
> >hayden@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >(888)917-1600x120
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Paul Lantinga wrote:
> >
> >> Great! The more the better...
> >>
> >> IP Virtual Server version 1.0.0 (size=524288)
> >> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> >> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> >> TCP http-vip:http wlc
> >> -> iis5:http Masq 6 112 182
> >> -> nt4-iis1:http Masq 6 49 2346
> >> -> secondapache:http Masq 6 129 471
> >> -> flog:http Masq 6 55 2043
> >> IP Virtual Server version 1.0.0 (size=524288)
> >> Prot LocalAddress:Port Conns InPkts OutPkts InBytes
> >> OutBytes
> >> -> RemoteAddress:Port
> >> TCP http-vip:http 27666591 1445M 1923M 86285M
> >> 2741G
> >> -> iis5:http 49154235 2062M 2945M 132G
> >> 4190G
> >> -> nt4-iis1:http 46939476 1814M 2604M 92079M
> >> 3639G
> >> -> secondapache:http 49401039 2640M 3656M 168G
> >> 5135G
> >> -> flog:http 6784271 330452K 447690K 20610M
> >> 643G
> >> IP Virtual Server version 1.0.0 (size=524288)
> >> Prot LocalAddress:Port CPS InPPS OutPPS InBPS
> >> OutBPS
> >> -> RemoteAddress:Port
> >> TCP http-vip:http 385 16450 21553 1038078
> >> 30236201
> >> -> iis5:http 19 5489 8111 326980
> >> 11931418
> >> -> nt4-iis1:http 173 2216 2332 148643
> >> 2680871
> >> -> secondapache:http 43 6281 8305 388215
> >> 11942636
> >> -> flog:http 150 2464 2805 174240
> >> 3681275
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Paul Lantinga
> >> Q9 Networks
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
