lvs-users
|
To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: can I use ip route to dst:port |
Cc: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxx>, Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <busterb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <J.D.F.Palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | "mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:04:14 -0500 (EST) |
> > I'm not sure but it seems the localout fwmarking is useless. No, it all works, fwmarks, everything. Packets from RIP to 0/0:telnet go via SERVER_GW, the rest (eg RIP to 0/0:ftp) go to the default gw. My first posting today had everything working, except I needed a default route for packets from RIP to 0/0 in table main. I didn't understand why I needed this entry. I wanted to do it without a default gw. > > I think I will go have a beer. > > Go for another one :) I'm having it right now Joe -- Joseph Mack, mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx Linux Virtual Server project http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: can I use ip route to dst:port, Julian Anastasov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Redirector project for FreeBSD, Roberto Nibali |
Previous by Thread: | Re: can I use ip route to dst:port, Julian Anastasov |
Next by Thread: | [Solutions] Loadbalancing multiple SQUID parents using a parent persistence selection per client connection, Alexandre CASSEN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |