|
Joe,
Yep, I was able to successfully setup Tun accepting packets via a VIP on
the director ("original standard" configuration). However, when I attempt
to use Fwmarks, without the VIP on the Director, the packets don't get
marked.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Jeff
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Jeff wrote:
> I sure have.
OK. it's hard to tell sometimes.
> If fact, that's where I first noticed section 7.9 "fwmark
> allows LVS-DR director to be default gw for realservers".
That's what it's supposed to do. I can't remember offhand what examples
are in there.
> I've attempted to
> emulate the examples provided, but I seem to be missing something. (Of
> course, I am using Tun instead of DR.)
Should still work. You're doing two things at once, setting up with fwmark
and then Tun. You could try with DR first to check, and with just
accepting packets via a VIP rather than the fwmark.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack, mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Virtual Server project
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org
|
