lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Why are servers that are down still active? |
From: | Martijn Klingens <mklingens@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:28:49 +0200 |
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 16:56, Wensong Zhang wrote: > I saw that the weight was 600 in the your ipvsadm output. Whoooops :/ I misread the 0 in the second column as the prio. Given the time that I'm using ipvsadm already that's a stupid mistake to make. *Ducks into a small corner* That also explains another question that I had (but didn't post yet), so it all makes sense now. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction again! -- Martijn |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4 Hidden Patch, Julian Anastasov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Survey: synchronisation and deployment, Tim Hollingsworth |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Why are servers that are down still active?, Wensong Zhang |
Next by Thread: | Survey: synchronisation and deployment, Tim Hollingsworth |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |