lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Favorite cert authority? |
From: | nick garratt <nick-lvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:09:01 +0200 |
cluster. This is only for one FQDN, by the end of next year, I'll need to secure three more domains hosted by these servers... Perhaps I heard wrong, but I had thought that I could simply get one cert for a domain (in this case www.smartbrief.com) and use it on all the servers hosting it in my LVS system, but the Verisign people said I needed to buy licenses for each server in the system! if you're using NAT you'll just need the one cert for, as you correctly state, its per FQDN. one cert works fine for my NATed cluster. not too sure what the implications of DR would be in this context... all a CA is a trusted third party with the buy-in from the browser manufacturers. the tech is not rocket science either. could be anyone; there's clearly an opportunity for another operator. nick |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Favorite cert authority?, Doug Schasteen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | sync daemons, Daniel Burke |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Favorite cert authority?, Doug Schasteen |
Next by Thread: | RE : Favorite cert authority?, Frédéric SCHWIEN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |