|
Hello Julian,
Count me too :) I'm on 1.0.6 but ... on 2.2 kernel, may be
I guess with the TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE patch :). I've some LVS boxes with
320+ uptime running 0.9.7, LVS-DR. Some funky negative counter issues
but as long as there is memory left, I don't change it :). There are
also a lot of 0.9.13 trees running in my productive environment together
with the threshold patch.
2.2.x is simply the most stable kernel for a network server in
production. Not the fastest though, but hardware is cheap.
patched ... :) If your IDE works (of course, there is a backport
from 2.4 that really works), then you can try another toy, the
backported QoS from 2.4 to 2.2, with HTB :)
Schweeeet! This is very cool. Ingress rate limiting on 2.2.x kernels.
Thank you, Julian. I think I just need to rewrite my customer
requirement paper to include kernel 2.2.x. Happiness, joy ...
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ds9/
I hope you did get the locking right :) [Not that I care a lot, I'm
still mostly running UP]
Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc
|
