LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Persistance

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Persistance
From: "Ben" <bench@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:40:41 -0700
It depends on your application, of course. For stateless protocols,
persistance isn't so great. For stateful connections which may be silent for
a while, persistance is the only way to go.

----- Original Message -----
From: "mixo" <mixo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:00 AM
Subject: Persistance


>
> Is persistance a bad idea? Are there any situation where it might be
deemed
> suitable?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>