Hello,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> So? What's the problem, it won't fill the buffer anyway.
I assume the parts can be split on different lines if
another CPU uses printk at the same time but I may be wrong.
> >>>+ h.th->rst? "R":"r");
> > No, I will not change it :) '-' is not even 1 bit information
> > about what the flag is, you have to look at the sources.
>
> ??? What's the difference between "R" and "r"? for me "R" means RST flag
> set and "r" means not set, right? Or is this again the missing morning
> coffee issue?
>
> A SYN/ACK in your case looks like: SAFR, in my case as SA--.
SAfr
By this way you see that we have support for SAFR and not
for PU :)
> Thanks. Best regards,
> Roberto Nibali, ratz
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|