LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: 'Preference' instead 'persistence'?

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 'Preference' instead 'persistence'?
From: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm.turnbull@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:16:21 +0100
>DB tuning always needs advanced tricks and most of the time you need a
> Russian guy to do this :)

Database tunning is pretty simple really :
The less you access the persistent IO (hard disks) the faster it goes...

So you need 1 database server say a 1GHz,500MB RAM with minimum 2HDs but preferably 2*mirror for tran logs and 2*mirror for data (more disks the better obviously ) £1K-£5K ?

Then you set up your DB with data & OS on one IO channel and logs ONLY on the other. (what ever Microsoft says Oracle is right on this...)

And this database is ONLY used for sessions (nothing else)

All the rest of your data can stay on the current DB server (or split it over read only mirrors if required balanced by LVS of course)

Should be pretty damn fast no ? and it also means you can scale up your web servers as much as you like without worrying about persistence.

The above applies for any decent database PostGreSQL, Oracle, DB2, Sybase, Informix, MSSQL etc.

just my 2 pence.




--

Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull

IT Manager
Crocus.co.uk Limited
Nursery Court
London Road
Windlesham
Surrey
GU20 6LQ

01344 629661
07715 770523

http://www.crocus.co.uk/

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>