|
with the local director currently on the virtual side of the
localdirector has to be a different vlan then the real server side.
router
|
|
| VIP1 1.1.1.1 VLAN 40
-----------------
LOCAL DIRECTOR
-----------------
|
| RIP1 1.1.1.4 VLAN 50
-------------
server
-------------
Thanks!
-Nathan
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 15:36, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Nathan Jang wrote:
> >
> > do I have to do any sort of VLAN seperation when useing this LVS-DR?
>
> I don't know what "any sort of VLAN" is, but standard routing as has
> been available since the 2.0.x kernels is used.
>
> > currently I am useing the Cisco Localdirector and am looking to change
> > to LVS and still retain the same functionality as my current setup (is
> > there documentation on how to achieve this?).
>
> there's documentation on setting up LVS-DR which is either close or identical.
>
> and also would like to
> > know in the documentation it looks like you have to have 2 nicks.. is it
> > not possible just to send the reply out the same nick to the ip of the
> > router?
>
> you can have 1 or 2 nics on the director.
> The realservers only need 1 nic
>
> >
> > questions are from the first diagram of this documentation :-)
>
> yes fine.
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor
> to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
--
-Nathan Jang-
-Network Engineer
-Netnation Communications Inc.
-PH: 604-688-8946 ex128
-FX: 604-688-8934
-http://www.netnation.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer
|
