Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation

To:	<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation
From:	"Jacob Coby" <jcoby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:00:55 -0500

> #define NR_CONNS ((1 << \
> (8 * sizeof((*((struct ip_vs_sync_mesg *(*)(void))0))()->nr_conns)))-1)

Holy confusing syntax, Batman!

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Horms Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Horms Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Jacob Coby <= Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Martijn Klingens Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Horms Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Horms Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Wensong Zhang Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Horms

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] additional proc entries for synchronisation, Roberto Nibali
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]