Hi,
Sorry for the delay.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Horms wrote:
> >
> > Don't worry. I wanted to remove the 255 in the code and replace it with
> > the calculated amount of connections from the struct, so once we'll
> > change it to 16bit we wouldn't need to run s/255/16383/g.
>
> Ahh ok, good pt. But it is probably safe to just leave it as is for now,
> or make it a static define. I think we can leave that up to Wensong.
>
I'd like to see that we will add more sysctl varibles to connection
synchronization in ipvs 1.1.* version, and it is good to keep ip_vs.h
short and keep most connection synchronization stuff in the ip_vs_sync.c
only.
Regards,
Wensong
|