lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SV: Set hashtable size in ip_vs.h? |
From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:42:06 +0900 |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:32:40AM -0500, Joseph Mack wrote: > Horms wrote: > > > > To be honest. You are probably going to see a bigger difference > > by compiling a non-SMP kernel and eliminating spin locks > > than you will twiddling the hash-table bits. > > > Are you saying that you expect SMP to slow down LVS under some circumstances? Yes. I believe that by having an SMP kernel then the overhead of spinlocks is not insignifgant under high load. -- Horms |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: SV: Set hashtable size in ip_vs.h?, Joseph Mack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: heartbeat tries to use lo:0 instead of eth0, Uwe Kruse |
Previous by Thread: | Re: SV: Set hashtable size in ip_vs.h?, Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | Re: SV: Set hashtable size in ip_vs.h?, Roberto Nibali |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |