LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS and Different Class C's

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS and Different Class C's
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:58:59 +0900
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:00:06PM -0600, AJ Lemke wrote:
> Hello all.

Hi AJ,

To reiterate Peter Mueller's request, please only send plain-text
email to this list.

> Can the LVS-DR direct traffic across class C's?  
>  
> Here is the scenario, I have 2 director boxes and they direct traffic to
> my squid boxes.  The squid boxes are in the acceleration mode.  The
> whole system works great.  The problem I have is that a client wants to
> have his website cached out.  That is all well and good his site is
> cached out just fine, but he has some ssl stuff that won't cache.  We
> have this in mind.  His site resolves to  VIP xxx.xxx.191.5.  We would
> just send the http:80 traffic to xxx.xxx.191.200, this is the cache
> server and the https:443 to xxx.xxx.190.60, is is the actual IIS server
> that the site resides on.

Yes, this is possible. If your linux directors are directly connected
to xxx.xxx.191.0/24 then NAT and Direct Routing should both work fine.
Otherwise you may need to use Tunnelling.

-- 
Horms
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>