lvs-users
|
To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | LVS and Different Class C's |
From: | "AJ Lemke" <aj.lemke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:00:06 -0600 |
Hello
all.
Can the
LVS-DR direct traffic across class C's?
Here is the
scenario, I have 2 director boxes and they direct traffic to my squid
boxes. The squid boxes are in the acceleration mode. The whole
system works great. The problem I have is that a client wants to have
his website cached out. That is all well and good his site is cached
out just fine, but he has some ssl stuff that won't cache. We have this in
mind. His site resolves to VIP xxx.xxx.191.5. We would
just send the http:80 traffic to xxx.xxx.191.200, this is the cache
server and the https:443 to xxx.xxx.190.60, is is the actual IIS server
that the site resides on.
Is this a doable
solution or do you have a better solution? I am all ears.
If you need more
information let me know.
AJ
Lemke
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: https sharing ip but not certificate, Peter Mueller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | ldirectord ipvsadm syntax seems strange...?, Guy Waugh |
Previous by Thread: | https sharing ip but not certificate, Alejandro Mery Pellegrini |
Next by Thread: | Re: LVS and Different Class C's, Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |