|
Could you elaborate a little more on this?
If my Directors are xx.xx.191.2 and xx.xx.191.3 respectively, with VIP
xx.xx.191.4, xx.xx.191.5 xx.xx.191.6. Both are using the 255.255.255.0
subnetmask on their DIP and VIP. Now my Realserver(IIS) is on
xx.xx.190.60 with a 255.255.255.0 subnetmask. There is a Cisco router
in between the Director and IIS box. When we do a arp -a on the IIS box
we get a TYPE invalid for the Directors.
Any Idea?
AJ
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Horms
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:59 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: LVS and Different Class C's
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:00:06PM -0600, AJ Lemke wrote:
> Hello all.
Hi AJ,
To reiterate Peter Mueller's request, please only send plain-text email
to this list.
> Can the LVS-DR direct traffic across class C's?
>
> Here is the scenario, I have 2 director boxes and they direct traffic
> to my squid boxes. The squid boxes are in the acceleration mode. The
> whole system works great. The problem I have is that a client wants
> to have his website cached out. That is all well and good his site is
> cached out just fine, but he has some ssl stuff that won't cache. We
> have this in mind. His site resolves to VIP xxx.xxx.191.5. We would
> just send the http:80 traffic to xxx.xxx.191.200, this is the cache
> server and the https:443 to xxx.xxx.190.60, is is the actual IIS
> server that the site resides on.
Yes, this is possible. If your linux directors are directly connected to
xxx.xxx.191.0/24 then NAT and Direct Routing should both work fine.
Otherwise you may need to use Tunnelling.
--
Horms
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
