LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Should the Virtual IP shutdown when all real servers are dead?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should the Virtual IP shutdown when all real servers are dead?
From: natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:55:35 -0600 (CST)
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Johnson L. Wu wrote:
>  Greetings,
>  
>  I have a config where:
>  
>  2 LVS directors are setup as an HA pair.
>  
>  LVS-A(MASTER) has real servers R1 and R2
>  LVS-B(BACKUP) has real servers R1, R2, and R3
>  
>  When both R1 and R2 go down, I see LVS-A generate an email notifying
>  the realservers being DOWN.  However, LVS-B does not assume MASTER
>  until someone unplugs the ethernet of LVS-A or simply powers down LVS-A.
>  
>  I wonder if there is a supported config for the master to tell the backup
>  to assume active once all it's realservers fail.

Just curious, why do you have R3 behind only one of the boxes?

It'd seem easier to just add it to both sets to me..

-- 
Nate Carlson <natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>   | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (952)943-8500

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>