|
Sorry to have made it confusing.
My original intent is that I can put
LVS-A(MASTER) --> real servers R1 and R2
LVS-B(BACKUP) --> real servers R3 and R4
If by any chance the connectivity between LVS A and R1 R2 dies,
but LVS-A can still talk to LVS-B, LVS-A will simply send an email
and not fail the V IP.
When this occurs, the admin will get an email but what really should happen
is that LVS-A should pass the V IP to LVS-B and have it become the master.
Thanks,
-Johnson
----- Original Message -----
From: <natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list."
<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: Should the Virtual IP shutdown when all real servers are dead?
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Johnson L. Wu wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have a config where:
> >
> > 2 LVS directors are setup as an HA pair.
> >
> > LVS-A(MASTER) has real servers R1 and R2
> > LVS-B(BACKUP) has real servers R1, R2, and R3
> >
> > When both R1 and R2 go down, I see LVS-A generate an email notifying
> > the realservers being DOWN. However, LVS-B does not assume MASTER
> > until someone unplugs the ethernet of LVS-A or simply powers down
LVS-A.
> >
> > I wonder if there is a supported config for the master to tell the
backup
> > to assume active once all it's realservers fail.
>
> Just curious, why do you have R3 behind only one of the boxes?
>
> It'd seem easier to just add it to both sets to me..
>
> --
> Nate Carlson <natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | Phone : (952)943-8700
> http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
