lvs-users
|
To: | "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Should the Virtual IP shutdown when all real servers are dead ? |
From: | Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:48:36 -0800 |
> LVS-A(MASTER) --> real servers R1 and R2 > LVS-B(BACKUP) --> real servers R3 and R4 OK > If by any chance the connectivity between LVS A and R1 R2 dies, > but LVS-A can still talk to LVS-B, LVS-A will simply send an email > and not fail the V IP. > When this occurs, the admin will get an email but what really > should happen > is that LVS-A should pass the V IP to LVS-B and have it > become the master. I would suggest using a program like mon (http://www.kernel.org/software/mon/) to down the interface or check with linux-ha like Joe & Horms suggest. There's nothing built in the LVS project that will do this. P |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Should the Virtual IP shutdown when all real servers are dead?, Johnson L. Wu |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LVS and reply delay, Horms |
Previous by Thread: | LVS and reply delay, Darek M |
Next by Thread: | [ANNOUNCE] ipvs 1.1.3, Wensong Zhang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |