|
pb wrote:
>
> Thanks Joe.
>
> FYI section 13.11 calls the director (aka. load
> balancer) a "NAT box" ;-)
fair cop.
Thanks
(We hasten to assure you that the people responsible
have been repremanded and that it won't happen again.
We have set up the LVS anti-sloppiness committee to
monitor the LVS documents for any more examples of
unclear thinking.)
This may be a hold-over from the 2.0.x and 2.2.x days
when LVS setup the de-masquerading, and you had to
setup the masquerading by hand, so the director was
a NAT-box too.
With 2.4.x, LVS is no longer based on masquerading.
I should fix it though.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor
to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA. mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx
|
