|
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:26:30PM -0600, Chip Upsal wrote:
>
> I am using ultramonkey 2.0.1 with firewall marks.
> I am loadbalancing two servers with several ip-virtual sites.
>
> On the virtual host directive i have been using real ipaddress on the lvs
> subnet for the real servers:
>
> Server1
>
> #Site 1
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.19:80>
[snip]
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.19:443>
[snip]
>
> #Site 2
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.20:80>
[snip]
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.19:443>
[snip]
> On the second server:
>
> #Site 1
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.19:80>
[snip]
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.19:443>
[snip]
>
> #Site 2
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.120:80>
[snip]
> <VirtualHost 192.168.2.119:443>
[snip]
>
> The ldirectord.cf file looks like:
>
> # site1
> virtual=1
> real=192.168.2.19:0 masq
> real=192.168.2.119:0 masq
[snip]
> # Site2
> virtual=2
> real=192.168.2.20:0 masq
> real=192.168.2.120:0 masq
[snip]
>
> Is this a valid setup?
I take it that Apache is using name based virtuals.
It looks kind of weird to me.
In the ldirectord.cf you have two sites. Each with two real servers.
I assume that they conrespond to the same two machines so.
Site 1 -> 192.168.2.19 (Real Server 1)
192.168.2.119 (Real Server 2)
and
Site 2 -> 192.168.2.20 (Real Server 1)
192.168.2.120 (Real Server 2)
This given, shouldn't the Apache setup be something along the lines of:
Server 1
#Site 1
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.19:80>
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.19:443>
#Site 2
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.20:80>
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.20:443>
Server 2
#Site 1
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.119:80>
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.119:443>
#Site 2
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.120:80>
<VirtualHost 192.168.2.120:443>
--
Horms
|
