|
I had already tried the so called fix and my compile still fell over ...
still investigating :(
Thanks - I didn't know about the leak patch.
Cheers,
James
On Wed, 21 May 2003 16:33:01 +0900, Horms wrote
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 05:00:28PM +1000, James Bourne wrote:
> > If you are attempting to compile Net::SSLeay for use with ldirectord be
> > prepared for some pain on RH9. See: http://www.bacus.pt/Net_SSLeay/.
>
> Shouldn't it work if one person produces a package and then makes
> that available? Besides, the fix to add "-DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5" in Makefile.PL
> seems pretty straight forward.
>
> There is also the alternative to just use ldirectord without
> Net::SSLeay. The only disadvantage is that you can't check https
> services. Everything else should work.
>
> While on the subject of Net::SSLeay. Make sure that you apply the
> leak patch... unless you want it to leak like a sieve when used in
> conjunction with ldirectord.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=103776170206501&w=2
>
> This is of course included in the packages which are currently
> available from http://www.ultramonkey.org/. It has also
> been included packages available from Debian. Though I think
> that this is only in testing/unstable.
>
> > Has anyone had any success [been brave enough] w/ Net::SSLeay on RH9?
> >
> > I wonder if this is one of reason ipvs was left out of the stock RH9
2.4.20
> > series kernels?!
>
> I doubt it. Red Hat has never used ldirectord in conjunction with
> LVS. They use their own user-space tools which are bundled as Piranha.
>
> --
> Horms
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-
> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-
request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
