Re: LVS Director as default gw?

lvs-users

Re: LVS Director as default gw?

To:	"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, matthew@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: LVS Director as default gw?
From:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2003 12:45:01 -0400

Matthew Crocker wrote:

> 
> Actually, this isn't true.  I have a LVS setup with a mix of LVS-NAT
> and LVS-DR.  All traffic passes through the LVS boxes  works just fine.

did you install Julian's martian modification patch, and set the /proc 
filesystem
to allow martians or do have some new way that I don't know about?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor 
to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA. mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LVS Director as default gw?, 刘爱华(Aihua Liu) Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Horms Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Matthew Crocker RE: LVS Director as default gw?, Easytrans Systems Limited (Laurie Baker) Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Horms Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Joseph Mack <= Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Matthew Crocker Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Joseph Mack Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Matthew Crocker Re: Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Aihua Liu Re: Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Julian Anastasov LVS Director as default gw?, Aihua Liu Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Aihua Liu Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Aihua Liu Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Malcolm Turnbull Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Horms

Previous by Date:	persistence question., Duane Bedeau
Next by Date:	Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Joseph Mack
Previous by Thread:	Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Horms
Next by Thread:	Re: LVS Director as default gw?, Matthew Crocker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]