lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: TCPSP vs IPVS |
From: | Alexandre Cassen <Alexandre.Cassen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 26 May 2003 10:43:35 +0200 |
Hello, > Does the current implementation support unsplicing at all? Currently not, we spoke about this with wensong last month, but currently not enought time for contributing this code :/ > I agree that is probably isn't needed very much, > especially in the keepalive case. Yes, but we need unsplice to detect peer die, ... mainly peer connection error reflected to socket descriptor... Best regards, Alexandre |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: TCPSP vs IPVS, Horms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Heartbeat to Windoze?, Lawrence Strydom |
Previous by Thread: | Re: TCPSP vs IPVS, Horms |
Next by Thread: | Re: TCPSP vs IPVS, Gujjar Vikas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |