Re: [PATCH-2.4] fix locking in est scheduler

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-2.4] fix locking in est scheduler
From: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:24:15 +0800 (CST)

Hi Ratz,

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Roberto Nibali wrote:

> This patch addresses the locking in the est scheduler (I wasn't aware of it 
> :)). 
> It is then compliant to 2.5.x locking. Please consider applying if correct.

It probably doesn't matter, because there is no other writers of est_list. 
There is one thread writing the IPVS config at a time.

> Questions:
> o What about syncing the OVERLOADED code from 2.5.x to 2.4.x?

Yes, but we need to make some release candidates before releasing 

> o What do you think about introducing the sltimer changes from 2.5.x to 2.4.x?

Although the sltimer changes from 2.5.x looks nicer, it doesn't improve 
any performance. :)

> o Why do we have two different services list traversals for rr and wrr?

rr is simple, though wrr is superset of rr.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>