On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> This patch addresses the locking in the est scheduler (I wasn't aware of it
> It is then compliant to 2.5.x locking. Please consider applying if correct.
It probably doesn't matter, because there is no other writers of est_list.
There is one thread writing the IPVS config at a time.
> o What about syncing the OVERLOADED code from 2.5.x to 2.4.x?
Yes, but we need to make some release candidates before releasing
> o What do you think about introducing the sltimer changes from 2.5.x to 2.4.x?
Although the sltimer changes from 2.5.x looks nicer, it doesn't improve
any performance. :)
> o Why do we have two different services list traversals for rr and wrr?
rr is simple, though wrr is superset of rr.