lvs-users
|
To: | " (lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RealServer Public IP Addresses |
From: | "Walsh, Ed" <ewalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:13:15 -0400 |
Hi All, I have a simple question as I'm a bit confused about Real Servers. I have LVS-DR running fine and working just as advertised! It was a lot of work but it has definitely paid off. My question is this, do each real servers website need a public ip address? I have the following: RealServer1 (Redhat 9) - 172.16.1.21 private network - 192.168.1.21 public network NAT to outside address (ie. 208.151.202.21) RealServer2 (Redhat 9) - 172.16.1.22 private network - 192.168.1.22 public network NAT to outside address (ie. 208.151.202.22) I plan to have multiple websites for load balancing on both of the RealServers (I've already created these and they work well too). I have the VIP 192.168.1.20 (VIP also NATted to 208.151.202.20) balancing to both 192.168.1.21 and .22. The question is do the RealServers really need the NAT external ip address (208.151.202.x)? Couldn't I just remove the NAT assigned each RealServer ip address as long as the 192.168.1.x network is able to go out onto the internet? If I add the second Load Balanced/VIP website, do I have to assign another different external ip address (ie. 208.151.202.30, .31, and .32?) Thanks in advance for answering. Thanks, +--------------------------------------
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipvs 1.0.10rc2, Horms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | TCP server load balancer, Gujjar Vikas |
Previous by Thread: | [ANNOUNCE] ipvs 1.0.10rc2, Wensong Zhang |
Next by Thread: | TCP server load balancer, Gujjar Vikas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |