|
Thank you both for your advice :)
> ken price wrote:
>
>> > whoa. You don't have to set up masquerading at all
>> > in 2.4 kernels
>> > for LVS to work.
>>
>> My bad. I should have been more specific. In a
>> LVS-NAT setup using a 2.4 kernel, you're correct. in
>> my experience, I have NEVER had to MASQ or SNAT the
>> director for LVS to work. A client could make a
>> connect to the real server and pull content.
>>
>> HOWEVER.
>>
>> For the real server to initiate an outgoing connection
>> through the director, like the server pinging the
>> client in this case, I've ALWAYS had to setup
>> masquerading. LVS alone was never enough. If I'm
>> wrong here, I apologize.
>
> we're both right :-)
>
> to allow the realservers to ping outside you have to do something
> to allow the packets out. However you don't need to add masquerading
> on the director to get LVS to work.
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
> SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
> Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
