LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-DR where Directors are also Realservers

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-DR where Directors are also Realservers
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:36:58 -0400
Horms wrote:

> There are some more options too: Use a fwmark service and be rid of your
> VIP on an interface all together.

getting rid of the VIP altogether is still a bit of a problem isn't it?

there;'s a solutions that apparently came originally from Julian 

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=106020019020431&w=2

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=106020171022117&w=2
(this is the one I don't understand, why are the packets being accepted 
locally?)


http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=106020384024935&w=2

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=106025816703369&w=2

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=106027054519969&w=2

etc

I haven't put it in the HOWTO as I don't understand what's going on.
Do you know what it's about?

Thanks Joe
-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>