Re: LVS-DR where Directors are also Realservers

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello,

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Horms wrote:

> > Also, the backup server must not create ARP problem if the VIP
> > is configured there.
>
> That is true, but it is possible to make handle the VIP
> such that it can work. This usually involves moving it
> from one interface to another when a Linux Director
> goes from active to standby, which is where this discussion
> began.

        Agreed. Except of using the backup as real server (then backup
should solve the ARP problem) is there a good reason to move the VIP?
May be in all other cases it simply can be deleted?

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>