![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | AW: persistence-check and timeout |
| From: | "Kettler, Holger" <Kettler@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:39:22 +0200 |
Errata: > > It might help, yes. I'm actually doing some test conducts an > > persistent > > based counters to use in conjunction with RS thresholds. > > Same as I do. But I need to do more tests. I thought, the > (indirect) trick could be, to set lower-threshold to a value > closely to the minimum needs (one connection), to prioritise > all empty servers. I am _NOT_ doing tests with persistent based counters, but with various threshold settings. Greetings Holger Kettler |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | AW: persistence-check and timeout, Kettler, Holger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Netfilter connection tracking for IPVS 1.0.10/2.4.22, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: persistence-check and timeout, Roberto Nibali |
| Next by Thread: | Netfilter connection tracking for IPVS 1.0.10/2.4.22, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |