lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | AW: persistence-check and timeout |
From: | "Kettler, Holger" <Kettler@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:39:22 +0200 |
Errata: > > It might help, yes. I'm actually doing some test conducts an > > persistent > > based counters to use in conjunction with RS thresholds. > > Same as I do. But I need to do more tests. I thought, the > (indirect) trick could be, to set lower-threshold to a value > closely to the minimum needs (one connection), to prioritise > all empty servers. I am _NOT_ doing tests with persistent based counters, but with various threshold settings. Greetings Holger Kettler |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | AW: persistence-check and timeout, Kettler, Holger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Netfilter connection tracking for IPVS 1.0.10/2.4.22, Julian Anastasov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: persistence-check and timeout, Roberto Nibali |
Next by Thread: | Netfilter connection tracking for IPVS 1.0.10/2.4.22, Julian Anastasov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |