![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing? |
| From: | Carlos Ordonez <carloso@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:58:06 -0400 |
It seems to me that you don't need to use LVS, just use a monitor like
"mon" to do your fail over.
Carlos:-)
Jon Neher
<jneher@darkwing.
uoregon.edu> To
Sent by:
lvs-users-bounces lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+carloso=us.ibm.c cc
om@linuxvirtualse
rver.org
09/29/2003 12:46
PM Subject
ultramonkey failover between
realservers rather than load
Please respond to balancing?
"LinuxVirtualServ
er.org users
mailing list."
<lvs-users@linuxv
irtualserver.org>
We've been using ultramonkey/heartbeat for a while with one
director (with a failover director) to load balance some services
to 2 realservers and it's working great. We have a situation
now where we need to only have one realserver (r1) being routed to
at a time and then have the other realserver (r2) routed to only
in the case that the services become unavailable on r1.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how best to configure this?
Thanks,
Jon
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?, Jon Neher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load bal ancing?, Peter Mueller |
| Previous by Thread: | Both directors take all vip's with keepalived, Ajit Kashyap |
| Next by Thread: | RE: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load bal ancing?, Peter Mueller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |