LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?
From: Carlos Ordonez <carloso@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:58:06 -0400



It seems to me that you don't need to use LVS, just use a monitor like
"mon" to do your fail over.
Carlos:-)







                                                                           
             Jon Neher                                                     
             <jneher@darkwing.                                             
             uoregon.edu>                                               To 
             Sent by:                                                      
             lvs-users-bounces         lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    
             +carloso=us.ibm.c                                          cc 
             om@linuxvirtualse                                             
             rver.org                                                      
                                                                           
                                                                           
             09/29/2003 12:46                                              
             PM                                                    Subject 
                                       ultramonkey failover between        
                                       realservers rather than load        
             Please respond to         balancing?                          
             "LinuxVirtualServ                                             
               er.org users                                                
              mailing list."                                               
             <lvs-users@linuxv                                             
             irtualserver.org>                                             
                                                                           
                                                                           





We've been using ultramonkey/heartbeat for a while with one
director (with a failover director) to load balance some services
to 2 realservers and it's working great.  We have a situation
now where we need to only have one realserver (r1) being routed to
at a time and then have the other realserver (r2) routed to only
in the case that the services become unavailable on r1.

Does anyone have any suggestions on how best to configure this?

Thanks,

Jon
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?, Carlos Ordonez <=