lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing? |
From: | Jon Neher <jneher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:46:28 -0700 (PDT) |
We've been using ultramonkey/heartbeat for a while with one director (with a failover director) to load balance some services to 2 realservers and it's working great. We have a situation now where we need to only have one realserver (r1) being routed to at a time and then have the other realserver (r2) routed to only in the case that the services become unavailable on r1. Does anyone have any suggestions on how best to configure this? Thanks, Jon |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Both directors take all vip's with keepalived, Ajit Kashyap |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?, Carlos Ordonez |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Heartbeat running resources twice, Kelly Corbin |
Next by Thread: | Re: ultramonkey failover between realservers rather than load balancing?, Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |