lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Supose there are no real servers... |
From: | "Lorn Kay" <lorn_kay@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:06:54 +0000 |
What should be the behaviour? If we think of a simple cenario where there is a only a single realserver, the lvs can be tought as a router. If it was a router, and there was no machine to route to (because it was down) I think a client would receive a "icmp no destination found" or similar. I've testes with my lvs-dr setup and the client stalls trying to connect... I think the above behaviour would make more sense...Well, just wanted to do the question, feel free to find it a bug, a feature,or simply kick my butt if what I'm saying is nonsense.. (altough in that case I would like to understand why it is nonsense) Checkout the "fallback=" option in the Ldirectord configuration file. This lets you redirect users to another place (usually the loopback address for a locally running daemon on a Director using LocalNode mode) when the Real Servers aren't working. --K _________________________________________________________________Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Heartbeat problem, Michael Lee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: curious ESTABLISHED timeout ?, SB CH |
Previous by Thread: | Heartbeat problem, Michael Lee |
Next by Thread: | lvs problem, Oliver |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |