lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: new location for LVS-HOWTOs |
From: | "Jacob Coby" <jcoby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:33:09 -0500 |
> I'm not convinced. This will not sort entries by date. Imagine following > two (fictive, but syntactically and semantically correct) error_logs: That's a bit out there, don't you think? IIRC, the context was how to take several rotated logs, blob them back together for weekly analysis, for which case my example works fine. If you're trying to stitch error logs from seperate sources, then yes, it become less-trivial, and you're better off going with a scripting language to do the stitching. -Jacob |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Can LVS work with 64-bits box?, liuah |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LVS & UM 1.0.10 RH 9 HTTP POST request greater than ~1000, Julian Anastasov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: new location for LVS-HOWTOs, Roberto Nibali |
Next by Thread: | Re: new location for LVS-HOWTOs, Roberto Nibali |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |