LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re:

To: randy hoffman <randy_hoffman@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re:
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:20:18 -0500
randy hoffman wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> i am going with LVS-NAT.   However, the one thing i
> am not sure about is if LVS can SNAT the real server interface on the
> director. 

the director masquerades the LVSed services in both directions, ie you
don't have to setup any NAT'ing yourself. ipvsadm handles it for you.

> This would allow all real server traffic to go back through the
> director from multiple subnets as the default path back to the clients from
> the real servers is NOT through the director.

you want to setup LVS-NAT without using NOT the director as the default gw for 
the
realservers?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [no subject], randy hoffman
    • Re:, Joseph Mack <=
      • Re:, randy hoffman
        • Re:, Neil Prockter
        • Re:, Joseph Mack
        • Re:, Neil Prockter
        • Re:, Neil Prockter