|
randy hoffman wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i am going with LVS-NAT. However, the one thing i
> am not sure about is if LVS can SNAT the real server interface on the
> director.
the director masquerades the LVSed services in both directions, ie you
don't have to setup any NAT'ing yourself. ipvsadm handles it for you.
> This would allow all real server traffic to go back through the
> director from multiple subnets as the default path back to the clients from
> the real servers is NOT through the director.
you want to setup LVS-NAT without using NOT the director as the default gw for
the
realservers?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
|
