I am using Heartbeat for failover. And as far as ICMP packets how can I
test for it?
Thanks,
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Horms
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:21 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: Routing weirdness
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:52:29AM -0700, Sean Roe wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am having an issue with my LVS setup. I have 12 web servers behind
> 2 LVSes (setup for redundancy and fall over) they are set up for
> LV-NAT and they work fine. My issue is when the primary fails over to
> the secondary. It seems to take several minutes (~5) for the fallover
> to complete. Any ideas why?
>
> The director interface (Real) on lvs1 (eth1): 10.4.2.43 The director
> interface (Real) on lvs2 (eth1): 10.4.2.44
>
> The virtual interface shared between lvses (eth1:0): 10.4.2.46
>
> Here is the real weirdness: The http servers are set to route to
> 10.4.2.46 but when I do a traceroute it hits 10.4.2.43 as its first
hop.
>
>
> I am thinking that two real interfaces need to be moved to a separate
> network (10.9.xx.xx) or something like that. I thought I read
> something about this a couple of nights ago but I cant find it now.
> BTW the directors are RH 2.1AS Advanced servers.
That is quite strange. First how are you doing your failover.
Are you using heartbeat or keepalived or something like that.
If so it should work.
Also, can you check to see if lvs1 (10.4.2.43) is sending out an ICMP
redirect. That might explain why your real servers are sending packets
via 10.4.2.43 instead of 10.4.2.46.
--
Horms
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|