|
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:12:07AM -0400, Patrick LeBoutillier wrote:
> Joseph Mack wrote:
>
> >Patrick LeBoutillier wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Are there any sheduling methods and/or packet forwarding methods
> >>that are better suited for permanent connections?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >as I'm sure you realise, there is no loadbalancing or high
> >availability with a permanent connection. Still if LVS is useful
> >here, then why not. I can't imagine the scheduler would matter a
> >whole lot here
> >
> >
> What I mean by permanent is that users connect in the morning and stay
> connected throughout the day. So the load balancing comes in when the
> connections are first established to distribute them across the
> realservers. And with connection synchronization I hope to be able to
> save the connections to the other realservers if the director goes
> down.
I don't see that your connection to the outside world would
have much influence over the scheduler that you choose.
The nature of your incoming connections should effect that.
Generally wlc is a good choice (IMHO).
--
Horms
|
