It depends on what os the machines need or that you want to run, plus
what they are layed out to do, and if it would do it efficently.
-Justin
On Mon, 24
May 2004, David Bain wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance. I'm on the learning curve.
> So effectively, this means that the minimum number of machines in an lvs
> configuration would be 3.
>
> On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 06:12, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > David Bain wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems to me that the load balancer for an LVS setup, need not be a
> > > linux box.
> > > Is this a reasonable assumption?
> >
> > the LVS code is specific for the linux kernel.
> >
> > Joe
>
|