LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: none linux Load Balancer

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: none linux Load Balancer
From: <jkreger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 20:10:05 -0400 (EDT)
It depends on what os the machines need or that you want to run, plus
what they are layed out to do, and if it would do it efficently.

-Justin
On Mon, 24
May 2004, David Bain wrote:

> Pardon my ignorance. I'm on the learning curve.
> So effectively, this means that the minimum number of machines in an lvs
> configuration would be 3.
>
> On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 06:12, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > David Bain wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems to me that the load balancer for an LVS setup, need not be a 
> > > linux box.
> > > Is this a reasonable assumption?
> >
> > the LVS code is specific for the linux kernel.
> >
> > Joe
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>