lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: distributed filesystems |
From: | Joerg.Rieger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Joerg Rieger) |
Date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 08:12:30 +0200 |
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:57:04PM -0400, John Reuning wrote: > I've also been interested in content replication issues and have > participated in this type of discussion. Just to make sure I've not > missed something in the HOWTO, is the summary... > > OSS distributed filesystems exist, but they're either dead or aren't > mature/production-ready. For high performance, enterprise-class shared > storage, one must invest in something like a Netapp filer, a FC SAN, or > an AFS infrastructure? > > ...? take a closer look at lustre [1]. [1] http://www.lustre.org/ -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | ldirectord still leaving fallback server in pool v1.88 fwmark configuration, Jonathan Trott |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: distributed filesystems, John Reuning |
Previous by Thread: | Re: distributed filesystems, John Reuning |
Next by Thread: | Re: distributed filesystems, John Reuning |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |