LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

user counts keepalived vs ldirectord?

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: user counts keepalived vs ldirectord?
From: Allen Pomeroy <apomeroy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 08:18:36 -0600
Many months ago I started the process of setting up an LVS. First task was the decision of how to do this: 1. purchase a distro (like RedHat's clustering application packages), 2. find out what the popular options/projects were and pursue one.

After evaluating RedHat's offering I decided support and popularity was seriously lacking - so I turned to the LVS HOWTO and this list. I setup a 2.4.25 kernel and keepalived (LVS-NAT) which seems to work well, with some minor irritations which seem to be fixed in the latest 2.6 kernel versions.

So the question: which method seems to have the biggest install base? keepalived or ldirectord?

Thanks,
AP


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>