LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: user counts keepalived vs ldirectord?

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: user counts keepalived vs ldirectord?
From: Casey Zacek <cz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 15:38:03 -0500
I run ldirectord and vrrpd, but will probably be migrating to
keepalived before long.

Allen Pomeroy wrote (at Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:18:36AM -0600):
> Many months ago I started the process of setting up an LVS.  First task 
> was the decision of how to do this: 1. purchase a distro (like RedHat's 
> clustering application packages), 2. find out what the popular 
> options/projects were and pursue one.
> 
> After evaluating RedHat's offering I decided support and popularity was 
> seriously lacking - so I turned to the LVS HOWTO and this list. I setup 
> a 2.4.25 kernel and keepalived (LVS-NAT) which seems to work well, with 
> some minor irritations which seem to be fixed in the latest 2.6 kernel 
> versions.
> 
> So the question:  which method seems to have the biggest install base? 
> keepalived or ldirectord?
> 
> Thanks,
> AP
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> 

-- 
Casey Zacek
Senior Engineer
NeoSpire, Inc.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>