I run ldirectord and vrrpd, but will probably be migrating to
keepalived before long.
Allen Pomeroy wrote (at Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:18:36AM -0600):
> Many months ago I started the process of setting up an LVS. First task
> was the decision of how to do this: 1. purchase a distro (like RedHat's
> clustering application packages), 2. find out what the popular
> options/projects were and pursue one.
>
> After evaluating RedHat's offering I decided support and popularity was
> seriously lacking - so I turned to the LVS HOWTO and this list. I setup
> a 2.4.25 kernel and keepalived (LVS-NAT) which seems to work well, with
> some minor irritations which seem to be fixed in the latest 2.6 kernel
> versions.
>
> So the question: which method seems to have the biggest install base?
> keepalived or ldirectord?
>
> Thanks,
> AP
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
--
Casey Zacek
Senior Engineer
NeoSpire, Inc.
|