|
Peter,
Thanks for the information, that reflects my experience as well, that Piranah
doesn't support DR. It looks like the LVS project itself does, but I'm not sure
how to integrate that in with a Piranha system.
Again, thanks for the reply,
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Dongluo Chen [mailto:dongluo.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:59 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: LVS/Piranha and Direct Routing example
I do not use Piranha. But it seems that Piranha does not
support LVS/DR at present. The following paragraph is from
http://www.redhat.com/support/resources/howto/piranha/
"Currently, the LVS cluster supports one routing method,
Network Address Translation (NAT). (In the future, tunneling
and direct routing will be added.)"
Ultra Monkey provides LVS packages for Redhat Enterprise
Linux 3.0 . I think you could try it.
-Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Farrell, Doug" <DFarrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list."
<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 8:58 PM
Subject: LVS/Piranha and Direct Routing example
Hi all,
Does anyone have an example of a Piranha (LVS) software on a Redhat
Enterprise Linux 3.0 system using the Direct Routing system?
I've got a NAT configuration running, but am having no luck at all
getting a DR configuration working. If someone has DR working do you
think you could send me some samples of your configuration files so I
could see what you did? I'd also like an idea what you've done with
your hardware/network layout to get this to work.
Thanks,
Doug Farrell
Scholastic
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
