|
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 08:28:29AM -0700, Todd Lyons wrote:
> In a paragraph, can you explain how either of these provide more or
> less advantage than ldirectord (built in to heartbeat)?
I'm not running heartbeat at the site in question, and wasn't thrilled
about setting it up between the director and two realservers. More
importantly, Mon is generalizable to an org-wide monitoring system
(which heartbeat is not). Mon has a wider range of service check
scripts and alerts than ldirectord has and is therefore more flexible.
If somebody wanted to monitor ipvs but take action ONLY by alpha pager
(i.e. *not* modifying ipvs) then Mon would be more appropriate than
ldirectord.
--
% You are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike.
Christopher DeMarco
cdemarco@xxxxxxxxxxx
+6013 389 5658
|
