Re: ipvsadm-1.24 for 2.4.x and 2.6.x differ

[Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@xxxxxxx>]

Interesting, the main difference that could count would be:

On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 16:09 +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@
>               if (!(dname = addrport_to_anyname(&daddr, ntohs(e->port),
>                                                 se->protocol, format)))
>                       exit(1);
> -             if ((!format & FMT_RULE))
> +             if (!(format & FMT_RULE))
>                       dname[28] = '\0';
>  
>               if (format & FMT_RULE) {

But I would expect the older one to be a bug corrected by the new
version.

Am I right?

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html