lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Netfilter patch-o-matic connlimit |
From: | Stuart Clark <stoodio@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:06:07 +1000 |
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:09:52 +0900, Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > LVS doesn't use conntrack, it's too slow. However I don't know why you > > can't get rules in PREROUTING to work > > Stuart, LVS in 2.6 has its own connection limiting code, have > you taken a look at that? Not yet - thanks for the tip. Any particular pointer to where to look? There are various ways around this problem, including activating persistance and doing connlimit on the real servers, and someone of the netfilter mailing list suggested looking into iproute2. Kind regards, Stuart. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LVS-NAT and packets originating from realserver, Horms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Pop-Before-SMTP and LVS, Josh Marshall |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Netfilter patch-o-matic connlimit, Horms |
Next by Thread: | Re: Netfilter patch-o-matic connlimit, Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |